The Council of Ministers just slid a stealthy hand into your pocket — and stole a euro. Think about it. Act 1: a score of people die in Germany from E Coli bacteria poisoning. Many more are hospitalized. Curtain for intermission. Act 2, the Council of Ministers quickly doles out 210 million euros of taxpayers’ money to many countries around the EU. What happened in the intermission?
Who is to blame for the infection? An authoritative German source says it came from Spanish cucumbers. Let us call this source Herr Schmidt so we do not have to be personal. Many irresponsible people are involved. Herr Schmidt is a minister, an elected democratic representative.
Herr Schmidt says Spanish cucumbers are to blame. The Spanish farmers protest. Nonsense, they say, there is no trace of infection here. To no avail. The market collapses. No one will buy Spanish cucumbers, nor in fact any vegetable or fruit from Spain.
Then under questioning from the press and the agricultural interests, Herr Schmidt retracts his remark about Spain. But it is really a bit late, all fruit and vegetable markets around Europe have been hit. The public does not want to eat them out of fear of ending up horizontal in a morgue.
We now have a European crisis. What should we Europeans do? The Community is built up on the principle of solidarity. So would it not be a good idea to help the farmers from Community funds? In the meantime Herr Schmidt has gone on to blame bean sprouts, also without proof, and, who knows, a meteorite shower of bacteria from space!
But hang on! Who is responsible for the debacle? I would say Herr Schmidt is largely to blame for the scare. He did not say:
‘What all consumers should do with all fruit and vegetables is to wash them well and cook them well as required. Bacteria die in boiling water. Wash your hands too! Eat safely like your mother taught you!’
No, Herr Schmidt started to blame an innocent party, causing hundreds of millions of euros damage. If any one is responsible it is Herr Schmidt. It makes better TV to blame and accuse rather than advise people on hygiene. If he was speaking for the German government as an official or employee then the German government — and their budget – is responsible too.
So how did the Council react? Does it lay the blame where it belongs — on Germany? No. It decided that all taxpayers in the whole of the European Union should pay for this German mistake. Why?
Like the quick movement of the magician’s hands comes this very old trick. It has been done many times in the past. It is called political collusion. They call it Solidarity. They assume the people will be so dumb to think it means solidarity of all the citizens. In fact it is not that at all but solidarity of the political clique acting against the citizen, his money and his rights.
Consider the implications. The politicians are set to blame the citizen and say ‘Collectively all the citizens are responsible financially‘. That is rubbish. The politicians are responsible for the rumour. The politicians, so-called democratic representatives, do not honestly represent the citizen because they can point to no link of blame between the citizen and the agricultural market loss. In this case most of the citizens’ real rights are best represented by consumer groups, taxpayers’ associations or economic analysts and health-care groups, not the politicians. That is why Schuman and the Founding Fathers declared that organized civil society, such as these associations, should be a formal part of Community governance.
Financially there is a causal, chronological and legal link between Germany, that is Herr Schmidt, bridging (1) the cause of deaths and injuries by E Coli and (2) the collapse of the market for cucumbers and other products across the EU and probably much further afield. There is no link with the taxpayer in the Outer Hebrides and the problem. Why then should a Hebridian crofter pay?
As far as I know, the Scottish crofters had personally nothing to do with it. They did not export lethal E Coli. They did not spread rumours or accuse anyone. Why should anyone in the Hebrides, or Rumania or Bulgaria compensate for a German problem? Why not the real culprit who started an authoritative but false scare?
Notice how the political class in the Council of Ministers defends themselves and takes YOUR money. Very quickly before anyone can reflect, all is decided. No debate in public. They decreed that 210 million euros should be taken from the European budget — the taxpayers’ money — and be given to those farmers in Spain and elsewhere who were hit by the scare. Did the Council of Ministers ask the citizen? No. Did the European consumer express an opinion through the institution set up for this?
The body that should be defending the citizen and the consumer as well as the taxpayer, the Economic and Social Committee, is asleep on the job. In a supranational Community, democratic debate and legal opinions are required for all financial decisions. That involves governments, organised civil society, regions and the European Parliament. Under de Gaulle the Council tried to short-circuit this system. It is quite illegal and immoral to do so.
E Coli caused the initial problem. The rest is a man-made problem. More precisely, a politician-made problem. It has nothing to do with the weather, a flood or drought. Solidarity can legally be expected there and is welcome to help the hard-pressed farmers. But this case involves a single origin: ministerial ‘foot in mouth‘ disease by Herr Schmidt. There is a clear causal relationship to Herr Schmidt for the real blame.
The Council compounded this problem with a crime. They stole money from the citizen, big time. They took money from all the citizens and gave it to someone else without asking the citizen. They took a euro from your purse or pocket! With 500 million citizens, 210 millions represents practically all the adult wage earners in the European Union. They stole one euro from just about everyone contributing to the European budget.
It is hush money. A bribe for silence. Just consider how unethical this is. What about the EU’s neighbouring counties? Many countries, perhaps candidate countries for EU membership, also suffered from a loss of appetite for vegetables and fruits. They could not export into the EU. Many of them also suffered financial losses when all of a sudden the EU citizens said: “No vegetables on my plate and certainly not cucumbers!” Russia blocked its imports of EU agricultural products. Many exports were affected. This caused a problem for EU farmers but also the Russian consumers. They had to pay higher prices. Should the Council of Ministers — who are very free and easy with other people’s money — send them a subsidy too???
Why, if this 210 millions subsidy was a just and fair policy, did the Council of Agricultural Ministers not spread taxpayers’ money much further abroad? Why did they not send European cash around the world to places in Africa, South America and elsewhere — which also took a financial hit as the German cucumber falsehoods were taken seriously?
The conclusions we should draw:
- Ministers and governments officials whether elected or not should keep their mouth shut on matters they do not understand. (That should save a lot of TV time! Public education about bacteria on TV is lacking.) The job of politicians is not to fill the airwaves with nonsense but to do their job. Sometimes this means keeping quiet. They should hush. The political class must be held responsible for what they say if it causes damage.
- Legal blame should be placed where the fault lies, according to the law. If some one is wronged he has access to the court. Why did the Spanish government not take Germany to Court? Each farmer has the right to take a case to Court in Germany. Now the Council has made a decision, they can also go to the European Court. The treaties say that European Court of Justice in Luxembourg is open for such cases, whether by the individual, an association, another European institution or a government.
- It is not the business of the Council of Ministers to short-circuit due legal process.
- It is not their job to give other people’s money to resolve the problem of Herr Schmidt.
- Taxpayers’ money of the Outer Hebrides crofter or the Rumanian farmer should not be used as a bribe. The Council does not have a right, without democratic approval, to use the budget and give it to other governments to dissuade them from taking legal action against Germany or any other Member State in such circumstances.
- The Council should ensure as soon as possible that the Economic and Social Committee is elected on a European basis as a representative body for consumers, producers and workers. A non-party elected body is needed to give democratic legitimacy to any Community decisions so that a political clique is stopped from abusing Community funds.
- Government controls should see to it that irresponsible rumours are not started or if they are by accident, a quick denial should be published immediately.
- The media should act responsibly and not propagate rumours from irresponsible sources. They should analyse what shenanigans the politicians are up to.
- The German government should be responsible both financially and democratically for correcting the spread of rumours that cause Europe-wide or worldwide problems.
- Bacteria are not political. Scientists, not politicians, should determine the origin of E Coli strains. Impartial European scientific bodies should handle the scientific questions.
- The Council of Ministers is not authorized by the citizen to pay out European money to deal with problems that should be handled by national governments according to proper democratic systems.
- The Council of Ministers should investigate how they can recover the money they have wrongly distributed from the citizens’ purse for non-European problems.
- The Council should stop acting as if the budget they have before them is their private money. It isn’t. It is not to be used for resolving the political embarrassments of fellow politicians.
- And most importantly of all. The Council of Ministers should remember they are only ONE of the FIVE major European institutions that have to be engaged in a real Community decisions. It is not for them to act like a political cartel abusing the public.
The ministers of agriculture in the Council should limit their appearances before the television cameras to one comment:
‘Keep your cucumbers clean. In turn we will keep our hands clean!‘
2 Responses to Budget7 : How the Council of Ministers just stole YOUR money in the E Coli scandal! »»
• The Council of Ministers should investigate how they can recover the money they have wrongly distributed from the citizens’ purse for non-European problems
We must have strong evidence to accuse and criticize. It’s delicate but it is our crisis and we must assume
I loved that Germany has tried to inform people all the time, the silence was not the solution, I think
My condolence to German families (39 German dead)
You are quite right that Germany has to inform people not only at home but throughout Europe and beyond. The first responsibility of the German government is to tell Germans and others how to avoid becoming victims of any E Coli outbreak in Germany. That involves hygiene. However the functions of an administration, a politician or a scientific agency are different.
It is the scientific agency which has to identify the source of an outbreak. Unfortunately this takes time. A politician should not try to say something while the investigation is going on. Nor should a politician, faced with a judicial case, comment on the culpability of a person undergoing a trial before a judge gives the verdict.
Consider what happens if the politician, Herr Schmidt, says the E Coli outbreak comes from (a) cucumbers (b) from Spain. That might mean that people will be encouraged to think (a) that all food except cucumbers is safe (b) all food produced in Germany — which has high hygiene standards normally — is safe. Germans might therefore eat food with E Coli from Germany or other countries. So might other Europeans. This lack of thought might encourage some consumers to eat food that has E Coli rather than stopping them. Further deaths might ensue.
Politicians should not be impatience to open their mouths about the origin in front of the TV cameras. They should use the opportunity of publicity to encourage good food hygiene and also encourage the public to have patience to wait for the scientific results. Anything else might cause further deaths or hospitalizations that are unnecessary.